On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 12:13 PM, Ralf Mardorf <ralf.mard...@alice-dsl.net> wrote: > On Mon, 17 Aug 2015 17:32:42 +0200, Oliver Grawert wrote: >> >> unfounded FUD > > What next? > > Actually everything I pointed out is correct, it's not unfounded FUD. > Even you mentioned that not all services are ported over. > > It's not that hard for me to make a profound comparison between an Arch > Linux install, that finished the transition 3 years ago and follows > systemd from upstream and an Ubuntu Wily install, since they are running > on the same machine and I'm using an upstream systemd with all services > ported. > > You actually don't know what you are talking about, if you call Ubuntus > systemd implementation transparent. It's a mess, the transition is > _not_ finished, init related files are spread over different locations.
You might have a point if systemd upstream didn't provide systemd-sysv-generator and systemd-sysv-install. Ubuntu and Debian are simply using upstream tools that allow for hybrid init systems. -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
