On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 09:18:31AM +0000, Andy Whitcroft wrote: > > > Regarding where it is done, I see no problem with doing it in > > > debian/control. If it's configured in the package itself we would > > > have the option to give a warning at the time people run dput rather > > > than later sending mail back from Soyuz complaining about it.
> > If you're going to put it in debian/control, then I think a Vcs-Bzr: field > > pointing at a UDD branch already encodes this information - 'apt-get source' > > already warns about it, we might as well have dput warn on the same thing. > Someone would have to make sure they point to the right place though. > I'd say about 80% of the packages I've looked at they are plain wrong. Wrong /and pointed at a UDD branch/? As I said, it's very unlikely that you'll have stale information here when the field points at a UDD branch. Stale data is usually because the field wasn't changed when merging from Debian. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/ slanga...@ubuntu.com vor...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
