2011/10/5 Colin Watson <cjwat...@ubuntu.com>: > I don't want to add extra archive-admin checking to the sync process; > firstly, we're moving towards self-service syncs anyway, and secondly, > as the libav example shows, syncs aren't really special here.
I agree that this shouldn't be an archive-admin job. However, due to the binaries land in the NEW queue (assuming the binary package name is based off of the soname), they seem like a natural *gatekeeper*, even though they might not be the actual *reviewer*. Perhaps some sort of integration (if not directly, then by way of a Greasemonkey script or whatever) between Launchpad's binary NEW queue page and the library transition tracker could help by indicating whether this is an expected, planned transition (i.e. a red warning light if there's no corresponding transition in the transition tracker or something to that effect.)? -- Soren Hansen | http://linux2go.dk/ Ubuntu Developer | http://www.ubuntu.com/ OpenStack Developer | http://www.openstack.org/ -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
