Am Mittwoch, den 05.10.2011, 14:35 -0400 schrieb Barry Warsaw: > On Oct 05, 2011, at 07:07 PM, Stefano Rivera wrote: > > >The sponsors not requesting testing and a transition effort commitment > >is something I've noticed too. I see transition sync requests that I > >don't look at immediately because they'll need a fair amount of review, > >and 10 mins later someone has gleefully sponsored them because they > >build successfully. > > Maybe we need to find ways to flag such potentially troublesome syncs early in > the process, so that it's more clear to the developer and/or sponsor. Have we > documented a specific set of criteria to watch out for, and can some set of > checks for those criteria be automated?
Yes, sponsor-patch could compare the old and the new list of binary package. If this list differs, it should ask the sponsoree to confirm this change. -- Benjamin Drung Debian & Ubuntu Developer
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
