Hey, On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 11:53:38AM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote: > On Monday, October 10, 2011 08:49:37 AM Alex Chiang wrote: > > * Scott Kitterman <ubu...@kitterman.com>: > > > On Monday, October 10, 2011 05:03:09 PM Sebastien Bacher wrote: > > > > Le lundi 19 septembre 2011 à 22:03, Benjamin Drung a écrit : > > > > > Why not discourage REVU completely? > > > > > > > > Reducing the number of sites in use and consolidating the > > > > workflows seems like a good idea indeed ;-) > > > > > > Where else is there a site that you can upload successive > > > versions of packages with the same version number and see diffs > > > between the uploads? > > > > mentors.debian.net ? > > > > It's what I recently used when I wanted to get a package into > > Ubuntu... I pushed it into Debian first. > > That's certainly a great (and generally preferred) way to do it. I don't > think it supports this particular functionality, however.
I just filed this https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=313388&group_id=100127&atid=413115 and FWIW there is also this bug which is relevant to deprecating REVU https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=313345&group_id=100127&atid=413115 If there are any other features that debexpo should take from REVU then please file requests for them. Cheers, -- Iain Lane [ i...@orangesquash.org.uk ] Debian Developer [ la...@debian.org ] Ubuntu Developer [ la...@ubuntu.com ] PhD student [ i...@cs.nott.ac.uk ]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
