I think that would be a great feature, since it's easier to look only at one site, and not to check in diferent places for solve the bugs, and if we had a software that in one or other way reports the needs of merging i don't think it will be to difficult to add a feature that reports it to LP aswell, but with which team should we coordinate? MoM team (i don't know who are the contacts for it) o with the LP team?
On Nov 22, 2007 8:48 AM, Morten Kjeldgaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > There is also http://dad.dunnewind.net/universe.php which, while > unofficial, > > has the advantage of having comments so people can give status of what's > > going on. > > > Which actually illustrates my point: there's dad and mom and revu and > wiki and launchpad and a number of other ad hoc services only known to > the especially initiated developers and some which duplicate functions > of others. > > Even though I am not a great fan of LP, it would make sense to transfer > the task of at least some of the "ad-hoc sites" to there. For example, > when generating the list of packages that need merging, it should *in > principle* be possible to report these *automatically* as "Please-merge" > bugs in LP, so the workflow could pivot around that. That would get rid > of mom and dad for starters. > > I realize that the workflow has probably evolved slowly along with the > MOTU population, but take this as a "fresh look" at the process. It > needs to be revised IMHO. > > Cheers, > Morten > > > -- > Ubuntu-motu mailing list > Ubuntu-motu@lists.ubuntu.com > Modify settings or unsubscribe at: > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-motu > -- aka nxvl Yo uso Software Libre, y tu?
-- Ubuntu-motu mailing list Ubuntu-motu@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-motu
