On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 01:42:29PM +0100, Stefan Potyra wrote: > > As a first step, I suggest merging motu-release and ubuntu-release for > > lucid.
> This seems to be the consensus so far, anyone disagree? > As FeatureFreeze is already tomorrow, I think we should immediately try to > find the procedure how to handle freeze exception requests (which I guess > will start to get filed from tomorrow on). To not block lucid development on > the lack of a procedure, I suggest that we keep the status quo and have > motu-release handle universe/multiverse exception requests with two +1 votes > and have ubuntu-release handle main/restricted as an interim solution. Ack; freeze announcement sent out with the status quo. Regarding the team unification, is there an expectation that the two-vote approach will continue? I don't have a strong preference between the ubuntu-release and motu-release approaches, but I think it would be strange to be applying different procedures for different archive sections - or to different members of the team! - so we should probably pick one... -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/ slanga...@ubuntu.com vor...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-- Ubuntu-motu mailing list Ubuntu-motu@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-motu
