On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 09:17:47AM -0500, James Dinkel wrote: >> See, you happen to need to access documentation that's stored in man >> page format. Others are in a situation where the packages they use >> store their documentation in html format. Without an html interpreter >> they're screwed. In this context, groff and w3m are exactly the same, >> so if we remove one, why not the other? > I already admitted to pandering to myself. And if groff is gone, then > I wouldn't be heart-broken. I would just include it in my standard > server set up, or install the package who's man page I need to read on > one of my handy-dandy test servers.
I'm completely missing why you are so determined to make the server install less useful by default? -- Soren Hansen | Virtualisation specialist | Ubuntu Server Team Canonical Ltd. | http://www.ubuntu.com/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-- ubuntu-server mailing list ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam
