Soren Hansen wrote: > If "don't be completely useless" is truly all we're aiming for, our > ultimate goal, I'm in the wrong job. Seriously. This might sound > pretentious, but I have higher ambitions than that.
Our "ultimate goal" IMHO ought to be to have a product that works well for the full spectrum of users. This includes those that want a "just enough" install as well as those that want a "gimme much" install and everyone in between. I really don't see what's so controversial about having a standard installer that is fairly lean, with a "really bare" option for those that want it as well as "more, more" option(s) for the others. But if you're unwilling to provide all three of those capabilities (bare, lean standard, more-more), then you're saying there's one or more classes of users that you don't want to serve. I doubt that's the case. But why fight against any of the above three options when there are very valid use cases and lots of customers for each? Michael -- ubuntu-server mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam
