Hi all, First things first: Len, i think you have very good points and it's obviously passion not ranting :) Your goal is honorable, i really hope for the same turn out as you.
I must say this discussion is a bit confusing to me, 3 things come out to me: - We want to follow the freedesktop standard, - We all seem to agree freedesktop isn't flexible enough our case... - we have actually been breaking the standard for a long time... Having this written, Kaj: Excellent job on https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuStudio/FeatureDefinitions/UbuntuStudioMenu It's clean and purposeful. Putting publishing under graphics is a tricky move, but it makes sense in many ways. I wonder if brasero would fit there like that. Brasero is obviously a home-publishing tool. but it's not very much of a graphic application. Perhaps it's ok to have it repeating itself in the various wrokflows? Like Kaj states in the last message before mine, we are redefining the hole workflow concept here, unless we take a stance for having a menu that isn't reflecting the workflow concept. Which i think will create confusion on the long run. I remember being told that we could rework those workflows, but that it would be feasible for later versions like 16.04... Is this really a goal for 15.10? Blueprint deadline is dangerously close to now. What about that "indicator" solution (i'm sorry, i have forgotten who brought it up on the IRC channel) for integrating the ubustu menu in other DE's? Looking forward to read you all, -- Set Hallström
-- ubuntu-studio-devel mailing list ubuntu-studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
