Simplest approach: US on a non-networked, encrypted desktop to make media and strip metadata that can identify cameras, plus a laptop used with TAILS to handle posting the materal from offsite connections.
On 10/29/2015 at 4:47 PM, "Ralf Mardorf" <ralf.mard...@alice-dsl.net> wrote: > >> On 29.10.2015, at 19:37, set <pub...@sakrecoer.com> wrote: >> >>> On 2015-10-29 18:22, lukefro...@hushmail.com wrote: >>> I agree with this. No way in Hell I would set up a machine for >my sister with >>> Debian Unstable, and not one of the Ubuntu flavors are involved >in the whole >>> Unity controversy. >> >> Please consider writing a guide on how to use ubuntustudio and >what to >> think of when engaging in activism and source-protective >journalism! >> That could also make a great post on http://ubuntustudio.org > >Perhaps activism shouldn't be mentioned regarding legal issues. >"Activism" in context of computers has much to do with >"Distributed Denial of Servic", "Guerilla Open Access Manifesto" >and some kind of hacktivism even is considered as being an issue >for free journalism. > >The averaged hacktivist doesn't need hints and the best hint for >unexperienced computer users such as journalists, is not to use a >computer for journalism at all and not to own a mobile or tablet >PC. > >It might be useful to clarify some issues with browsers, e.g. >problems with auto-completion of search engines, safe browsing, >but also when a sandbox is useful or not. Why wrong usage of >encryption and signing is more dangerous, then being aware that >data isn't safe. Even the man page of "shred" informs that the >default file system used by Ubuntu Studio renders "shred" useless. >Enabling popcon and stuf like this shouldn't be done. > >A high level of security and a user-friendly OOTB average desktop >experience are mutually exclusive. > >Regards, >Ralf -- ubuntu-studio-devel mailing list ubuntu-studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
