On Thu, 2011-09-22 at 13:06 +0100, Gordon Burgess-Parker wrote: > On 22/09/2011 00:06, Alan Bell wrote: > > On 21/09/11 23:29, Bea Groves wrote: > >> Just read the following. Comments? > >> > > yeah, it is potentially very nasty. > > Even more so when the next step could be to require signed keys to run > applications - then MS could control the hardware and the OS AND what > people actually run on it.
Don't you think laws regulating anti-competitive conduct will prevent that to happen? Actually any judge can argue that dual boot it's a reasonable thing you can do with your computer, because you get different functionalities with different operative systems. I think Microsoft would have a problem them. Regards, Juanjo -- ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/
