On 22/09/11 13:13, Juan J. MartÃnez wrote:
On Thu, 2011-09-22 at 13:06 +0100, Gordon Burgess-Parker wrote:
On 22/09/2011 00:06, Alan Bell wrote:
On 21/09/11 23:29, Bea Groves wrote:
Just read the following. Comments?
yeah, it is potentially very nasty.
Even more so when the next step could be to require signed keys to run
applications - then MS could control the hardware and the OS AND what
people actually run on it.
Don't you think laws regulating anti-competitive conduct will prevent
that to happen?
Actually any judge can argue that dual boot it's a reasonable thing you
can do with your computer, because you get different functionalities
with different operative systems.
I think Microsoft would have a problem them.
by which time the system will be set in and those who think that IE is
the internet will simply not care as long as it works, until they want
to actually do something different by which time it will be too late.
Regards,
Juanjo
Who said judges were reasonable, we
Paul
--
Paul Sutton Cert SLPS (Open)
http://www.zleap.net
17th September 2011 - Software freedom day
--
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/
