On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 1:20 AM, Robert Krawitz <r...@alum.mit.edu> wrote: > Date: Sun, 5 Apr 2009 23:57:33 +0200 > From: Pascal de Bruijn <pmjdebru...@pcode.nl> > > On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 6:04 PM, Hadmut Danisch <had...@danisch.de> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > just a proposal for an improvement: > > This lets get a few things clear. UFRaw's "Color Matrix" is in fact > a very small camera specific color profile. This color profile was > made by Adobe. They are usually of good quality. > > User made (downloadable) profile are of greatly varying quality. > > Quality in the sense of color profiles is pretty weird to talk > about in the first place. Accuracy and Prettyness, and likeness to > camera JPEGs are often three different and conflicting goals. > > The quality may well be good in the midtones, but near the boundaries > (particularly highlights), a simple linear application of the matrix > generates some real uglies (see my infamous > ftp://66.92.65.9/pub/crw_3888.crw sunset shot). > > Changing the gamma or linearity won't help here.
I just tried it, using gamma 0.35 and linearity 0.08 makes a _HUGE_ difference. No ugly color banding anymore! Regards, Pascal de Bruijn ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ ufraw-devel mailing list ufraw-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ufraw-devel
