Frank Gore wrote:
> My guess is a lot of those are irrelevant to JPG files since they're
> specific to the DNG format itself. So I guess UFraw 0.16 fixed my
> problem.
It did, I submitted a bug report for that a while ago.
> It's unfortunate that I did all my processing with UFraw 0.15
> up until now, so I have hundreds (thousands?) of pictures with no EXIF
> data that I need to re-process.
That's just a matter of using exiftool to copy the tags from each source
DNG to the corresponding JPG file. From what I've from you here and on
PentaxForums, I believe you can write this yourself, but drop me a line if
you want me to send you a bash script to do this.
--
Richard Bellavance.
"Anyone who can't laugh at himself is not taking
life seriously enough." - Larry Wall
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Planet: dedicated and managed hosting, cloud storage, colocation
Stay online with enterprise data centers and the best network in the business
Choose flexible plans and management services without long-term contracts
Personal 24x7 support from experience hosting pros just a phone call away.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/theplanet-com
_______________________________________________
ufraw-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ufraw-devel
