Omuko Kipenyi:
For some strange reason, I do not get a lot of messages from Ugandanet. Sometimes I do not even get my own messages ! !
Back to the baby thing.
You are one of the architects of the federo document @
and you must have read it several times. It is very different from the 1962 doc.--someone else's baby. http://www.federo.com/Pages/Uganda_Constitution_1962.htm which had districts, territories and federal states. In 'your ' proposal you are advocating self-determination and equal power to all 13 economically viable states.
FN Lugemwa
Rehema Mukooza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Kipenji:Come on, man! Be a critical thinker. Think of some ways to solve or ways that may work better than what Lugemwa offered concerning the federating of Bugisu and Sebei or Bukedi. You are a classical example of unconstructive criticizm! How bad can things get?! Criticizing and yet you can not come up with a better solution, tells me that indeed you don't under the unitary system to its fullest nor federalism.Giving up when the thinking got tough on you, is not the easy way out. Challenge Lugemwa and show us your plans and ideas for the issues at hand. Make use of the same brain cells you used to question Lugemwa's proposal. I wonder how someone can point out a "problem" and yet he (you) can not manipulate that same problem for a solution. You see, that is the difference between knowledge and wisdom!Oh Allah, how I was waiting for your solution to come. And I'm still waiting. I stick to Lugemwa's proposal, so you know where my support lies.Zakoomu R.
Owor Kipenji <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:According to Professor Lugemwa one has to be able to recogniseone's baby and from that statement,that was very pregnant withmeaning I rested my case.You are at liberty to continue proposing whatever units/names youwish to ignoring the subtle idiosyncrasies embedded in those unitsat the your own peril.Thank you and have more wonderful discussions ahead.Thank you.Kipenji.==================================================================
jonah kasangwawo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:Mr. Kipenji,
according to the UPC map (which I think has also been adopted by the NRM),
Buganda does not appear as an entity. This has not stopped federalists from
proposing Buganda as one of the federal states.
If you have a problem with the proposal concerning Bugisu, Sebei or Bukedi,
why don't you propose an alternative ? We are all ears.
Kasangwawo
>From: Owor Kipenji <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: ugnet_: 1962 unworkable arrangement!
>Date: Sun, 29 Feb 2004 13:25:34 +0000 (GMT)
>
>So this time around,you did that very extensive consultations and
>yo!,you discovered that Bugisu and Sebei for example can work
>together or better still Bukedi which you refer to and yet that entity
>never exists anymore???.
>Th e taste of the pudding is in the eating and so I will keep my ears
>to the ground.
>Thank you.
>Kipenji.
>===============================================================
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Search - Find what you’re looking for faster.
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Search - Find what you’re looking for faster.
