On Mon, 27 Apr 2020 at 17:22, Keith Mitchell <ke...@smoti.org> wrote:
> > IPv6 is not some new fangled minority interest, the fact that mainstream > > ISPs support it now (BT, Sky, Zen) > It would be even better if one of those did not blow an important > advantage of IPv6 by giving their end-users non-dynamic address > assignments. > The double negative made my head hurt. Are you saying that one of them allocates static IPv6 addresses and that's a problem? or is the manner in which they allocate static IPs?
