From: "Jianping Yang" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Is this the language that should be used in a professional way? I wonder > how could this happen to the Unicode mail list! So many linguists afoot, and we will get bogged down in my attempts to provide a little spice to the subject? The difference, of course, is that those who are offended will only be offended for a short time. If UTF-8S were to by some miracle be accepted by the UTC, implementers will be put out and offended for most of the next decade. Trigeminal Software votes for simplicity. michka
- RE: UTF-16 problems Carl W. Brown
- RE: UTF-16 problems Shigemichi Yazawa
- Re: UTF-16 problems Michael \(michka\) Kaplan
- RE: UTF-16 problems Carl W. Brown
- Re: UTF-16 problems Michael \(michka\) Kaplan
- Re: UTF-16 problems Rick McGowan
- Re: UTF-16 problems Michael \(michka\) Kaplan
- Re: UTF-16 problems Jianping Yang
- Re: UTF-16 problems Michael \(michka\) Kaplan
- RE: UTF-16 problems Carl W. Brown
- Re: UTF-16 problems Michael \(michka\) Kaplan
- Re: UTF-16 problems Jianping Yang
- Re: UTF-16 problems Michael \(michka\) Kaplan
- Re: UTF-16 problems Jianping Yang
- Re: UTF-16 problems Michael \(michka\) Kaplan
- Re: UTF-16 problems toby_phipps
- Re: UTF-16 problems Shigemichi Yazawa
- RE: UTF-16 problems Carl W. Brown
- Re: UTF-16 problems Lisa Moore
- Re: UTF-16 problems Jianping Yang
- Re: UTF-16 problems Rick McGowan