From: "Jianping Yang" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > If UTF-8S were to by some miracle be accepted by > > the UTC, implementers will be put out and offended > > for most of the next decade. > > > > If it is, that is rule of law from UTC. Very true. <devil's advocate> And if they vote against it, will you do the right thing in THAT case as well -- never emitting this invalid form of UTF-8 again? Or will Oracle et. al. choose to ignore the law if the decision does not go their way? Just trying to help folks determine if all of this is being done for the good of the standard (as has been claimed here many times). michka
- Re: UTF-16 problems Michael \(michka\) Kaplan
- RE: UTF-16 problems Carl W. Brown
- Re: UTF-16 problems Michael \(michka\) Kaplan
- Re: UTF-16 problems Rick McGowan
- Re: UTF-16 problems Michael \(michka\) Kaplan
- Re: UTF-16 problems Jianping Yang
- Re: UTF-16 problems Michael \(michka\) Kaplan
- RE: UTF-16 problems Carl W. Brown
- Re: UTF-16 problems Michael \(michka\) Kaplan
- Re: UTF-16 problems Jianping Yang
- Re: UTF-16 problems Michael \(michka\) Kaplan
- Re: UTF-16 problems Jianping Yang
- Re: UTF-16 problems Michael \(michka\) Kaplan
- Re: UTF-16 problems toby_phipps
- Re: UTF-16 problems Shigemichi Yazawa
- RE: UTF-16 problems Carl W. Brown
- Re: UTF-16 problems Lisa Moore
- Re: UTF-16 problems Jianping Yang
- Re: UTF-16 problems Rick McGowan
- Re: UTF-16 problems DougEwell2