John Hudson wrote: > Michael Everson wrote: ... > >and some documents on different approaches to unifying or not > >unifying the bewildering array of early semitic writing systems,
> That *is* something that is going to impact on what I have to do, and > I would really rather not be forced to give up doing other things to > deal with that. Which I am, even now. If proposals are made for unifying scripts and Michael feels they shouldn't be unified obviously he has to make his counter arguments well before there is a ballot. If there is just a proposal simply for encoding additional Hebrew characters containing no proposal for unifying other scripts with it then Michael, or anyone else who feels the scripts should not be unified, has no need to comment. So if people need these additional characters any time soon I suggest that they make a straightforward proposal for encoding additional Hebrew characters and either leave talk of unifying other scripts with Hebrew aside for now - or make this the subject of a separate proposal. - Chris
