On 11 Sep 2011, at 00:23, Richard Wordingham wrote: > A font need not support such ligation, but a glyph for U+FB01 must > ligate the letters - otherwise it's not U+FB01!
Not in monowidth, it doesn't. Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com/
On 11 Sep 2011, at 00:23, Richard Wordingham wrote: > A font need not support such ligation, but a glyph for U+FB01 must > ligate the letters - otherwise it's not U+FB01!
Not in monowidth, it doesn't. Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com/