Le 09/11/12 00:40, Philippe Verdy a écrit :
2012/11/7 Jean-François Colson <j...@colson.eu>:
You missed
NEGLECTABLE RATING +
NO RATING
For this one, would it be a greyed star (meaning no info, N/A) or the
existing WHITE STAR for the minimum rating (the maximum rating being
the BLACK STAR) ?
Simply a black and white star.
If, in Christoph Päper's list, we consider a * is a black star and + is
a black and white star, we get (I'll use ? for the black and white star):
????? (10/10) HIGHEST RATING *****
????? (09/10) HIGHER RATING ****+
????? (08/10) HIGH RATING ****
????? (07/10) MID-HIGH RATING ***+
????? (06/10) MEDIUM RATING ***
????? (05/10) MID-LOW RATING **+
????? (04/10) LOW RATING **
????? (03/10) LOWER RATING *+
????? (02/10) LOWEST RATING *
????? (00/10) NO RATING
I was simply saying there was a hole between LOWEST RATING and NO RATING:
????? (01/10) NEGLECTABLE RATING +
(Name it as you want.)
For a five level rating, ? ? ? ? ? could do the job.
