Hmmm... As a person with Russian as the first language I can assure you that from any literate Russian-speaking person's perspective italic ū is an unacceptable and *WRONG* representation of п (because in Russian, unlike Serbian, there is й). Should we bother disunifying?
The fact that the lowercase letter is the same in both cases proves that the difference between N-Eng and n-Eng is purely stylistic rather than semantic. Unicode shouldn't bother with those minutia. > I suppose nothing will happen until the governments of eng-using countries come together with a proposal. Let's hope so. I wish they never do. Leo On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 2:06 PM, Michael Everson <ever...@evertype.com>wrote: > On 12 Dec 2013, at 15:29, Leo Broukhis <l...@mailcom.com> wrote: > > > Hasn't http://www.unicode.org/standard/where/#Variant_Shapes explained > it once and for all? > > No, because users of N-shaped capital Eng consider n-shaped capital Eng to > be *WRONG*, not an acceptable variant. And because n-shaped capital Eng > consider N-shaped capital Eng to be *WRONG*, not an acceptable variant. > > Disunification is the best solution. > > I suppose nothing will happen until the governments of eng-using countries > come together with a proposal. > > Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com/ > >
