> Italic is not plain text. Is this the only thing that would have stopped you from advocating disunification?
> Yeah. To heck with the end user and their pathetic preferences. Is a preference to have traditional and simplified CJK characters disunified more or less pathetic (and why) than the preference at hand? Leo On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 6:24 PM, Michael Everson <ever...@evertype.com>wrote: > On 12 Dec 2013, at 22:25, Leo Broukhis <l...@mailcom.com> wrote: > > > Hmmm... As a person with Russian as the first language I can assure you > that from any literate Russian-speaking person's perspective italic ū is an > unacceptable and *WRONG* representation of п (because in Russian, unlike > Serbian, there is й). Should we bother disunifying? > > Italic is not plain text. > > > > I suppose nothing will happen until the governments of eng-using > countries come together with a proposal. > > > > Let's hope so. I wish they never do. > > <irony>Yeah. To heck with the end user and their pathetic > preferences.</irony> > > Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com/ > >
