Le 13/12/13 00:10, Leo Broukhis a écrit :
In the case of ɖ vs ð vs đ, there are three different letters, as
follows from their names, that happen to have identical capital glyphs
(those you've mentioned plus U+0110 LATIN CAPITAL LETTER D WITH STROKE).
Speaking of đ, "an alternate glyph with the stroke through the bowl is
used in Americanist orthographies" without any [loud] cries about
disunification.
Have you ever made an inquiry about the fonts which might be rejected by
Americanists because đ has the stroke through the ascender and about the
fonts which might be rejected by Croatian/Sami/Vietnamese speakers
because đ has the stroke through the bowl?
If N-Eng and n-Eng are disunified but small engs aren't (should
they?), who keeps the "default" "toupper" conversion?
> And while they are at it, I wouldn't refuse if they squared the circle.
That's exactly right.
Leo
