As according to http://unicode.org/faq/emoji_dingbats.html , emoji characters do not have single semantics. Which I think it is not what the original proposer want? Or were I misunderstanding that 2015年7月29日 上午3:28於 "Doug Ewell" <[email protected]>寫道：
> gfb hjjhjh <c933103 at gmail dot com> wrote: > > > Probably if these symbols are to be added to unicode, it would better > > to allocate blocks that are not belong to emoji for them. > > I'm curious what this is supposed to accomplish. It's not as though > people viewing such a symbol on a screen or in print, or entering it on > a phone keypad, will know or care what its Unicode code point is, or > what other types of symbols have nearby code points. > > The Miscellaneous Symbols block contains U+2620 SKULL AND CROSSBONES, > U+2623 BIOHAZARD SIGN, and U+263A WHITE SMILING FACE. > > -- > Doug Ewell | http://ewellic.org | Thornton, CO 🇺🇸 > > >
