Dubin, Elisabeth wrote:
I believe the point is to create a _public_ dog run. We already have a
non-public dog run a bit farther west. I don't understand Ray's logic
below because child owners do not pay to use the tot lot, and no one
pays to use the park in general.
ok, my logic in asking what I was asking had to do with the public process of getting a dog run in place, not with whether or not I support a dog run.
here's what I'm getting at, put another way: if we're using a process (voting/membership via focp) to create a free public dog run, then that process should be free and public as well, don't you think?
......... laserbeam® [aka ray] I love dogs, btw.
---- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the list named "UnivCity." To unsubscribe or for archive information, see <http://www.purple.com/list.html>.
