Melani,
I don't care about your stupid stories. Are you still affiliated with UCD?
Your refusal to answer any more questions about UCD makes you look like a
jackass. When you join up with Cassidy, Sanderson, West, etc., in order to
falsly assert the evil intentions of one of your most honest neighbors, you
also look like a jackass.
I certainly hope you're not so stupid that you assume that this is the same as
an apology.
Mr. Glenn Moyer
Not number 1 in real estate sales
Not a jackass
----- Original Message -----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; UnivCity@list.purple.com
Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2007 12:33 PM
Subject: Re: Debunking the hysteria RE: [UC] Question for tech people
In a message dated 6/6/07 11:54:29 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I apologize, Glenn. I did misunderstand the meaning of that header, and I
agree that I was wrong. Frankly, the writing style of committeeman7 reminds me
of a different contributor to this list, so I was surprised at what I (thought
that I) found in the headers.
Glenn—there’s no conspiracy here, and no gangs—just neighbors trying to
make life better for all of us. Name calling, personal attacks, and anonymous
letters impede communication, rather than facilitating it. I’m happy to see
that you’ve done less of the name calling when called out on it, and I’m sorry
that you felt that I was personally attacking you this time. I have no
personal animosity towards you.
Glenn, I was also the victim of one of these anonymous posts which seems to
have a related writer. Back on April 2nd, the following email appeared on the
PFSNI listserv. I thought it was on the purple list also, but I can't find
that in my old emails. That writer was called [EMAIL PROTECTED] It's
especially interesting to me that both are AOL users, and both make this vague
reference to politics in their names. A coincidence? A copy cat now with
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Does anybody know how to figure this out?
First I'll copy the email exactly as it showed up - the stuff at the start
was there in the body of the email. After that, I'll send the details from the
internet:
FIrst, the body of the email:
************************************** See what's free at http://www.aol.com.
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from WEBMAIL-RD04 (webmail-rd04.webmail.aol.com [152.163.16.132])
by ciaaol-r02.mx.aol.com (v114_r3.5) with ESMTP id
MAILCIAAOLR0210-cc844611003d249; Mon, 02 Apr 2007 09:08:13 -0400
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Open Letter
Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2007 09:08:14 -0400
X-MB-Message-Source: WebUI
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-MB-Message-Type: User
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="--------MB_8C9433F1B2B0531_4BC_CF20_WEBMAIL-RD04.sysops.aol.com"
X-Mailer: AOL WebMail 24126
Received: from 72.92.8.120 by WEBMAIL-RD04.sysops.aol.com (152.163.16.132)
with HTTP (WebMailUI); Mon, 02 Apr 2007 09:08:14 -0400
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-AOL-IP: 152.163.16.132
Dear Committee Person,
I am writing you today because I have a few questions. Regarding the
property at 4800 Baltimore Ave: State Representative Jim Roebuck has been in
that building for years. Melanie Lamond has put him out with the reason being
that they could put more apartments in. When a zoning notice goes up, they are
supposed to notify the neighbors as to what is going on.
Please answer the following questions:
Why was there no community meeting regarding this issue?
Why was there no petition?
Why doesn't Melanie think that she has to follow the same procedures as
everyone else?
If it were anyone else, Melanie would be right their throat about it and if
Cedar Park Associates knew about this, why did they not notify the community?
If Cedar Park did know about it, I guess that means that Cedar Park swept it
under the rug because she must be close friends with someone in that
Association.
Thank you,
J.J.
cc Council Woman Jannie L. Blackwell
AOL now offers free email to everyone. Find out more about what's free from
AOL at
Next, the header information:
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from rly-ma06.mail.aol.com (rly-ma06.mail.aol.com [172.20.116.50])
by air-ma02.mail.aol.com (v114_r3.5) with ESMTP id MAILINMA021-8b446119d432d4;
Mon, 02 Apr 2007 20:18:32 -0400
Received: from ccat.sas.upenn.edu (ccat.sas.upenn.edu [128.91.200.226]) by
rly-ma06.mail.aol.com (v114_r3.5) with ESMTP id
MAILRELAYINMA066-8b446119d432d4; Mon, 02 Apr 2007 20:18:11 -0400
Received: from host (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by ccat.sas.upenn.edu (8.12.5-20030917/8.12.5/SAS.07) with SMTP id
l330I5IZ006866;
Mon, 2 Apr 2007 20:18:05 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from imo-d03.mx.aol.com (imo-d03.mx.aol.com [205.188.157.35])
by ccat.sas.upenn.edu (8.12.5-20030917/8.12.5/SAS.07) with ESMTP id
l330HwIZ006850
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 2 Apr 2007 20:17:58 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
by imo-d03.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v38_r8.1.) id 8.bdc.eb6978b (39332);
Mon, 2 Apr 2007 20:17:53 -0400 (EDT)
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 20:17:51 EDT
Subject: Fwd: Open Letter
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="part1_bdc.eb6978b.3342f72f_boundary"
X-Mailer: 8.0 for Windows sub 6033
X-Spam-Flag: NO
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.2.09/990901/11:28 -- ListProc(tm) by CREN
X-AOL-IP: 128.91.200.226
X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 1:2:434899581:6710886
X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 1
The claims in the email about me were totally off base and apparently
designed to slow down my zoning change, which they did. Can any computer-savvy
person on our listserv get to the bottom of this? If there is someone who can
find the guilty party(ies), we can stop them. If not, they can continue to
post misleading, untrue statements.
Thanks,
Melani Lamond
Melani Lamond, Associate Broker
Urban & Bye, Realtor
3529 Lancaster Ave.
Philadelphia, PA 19104
cell phone 215-356-7266
office phone 215-222-4800, ext. 113
office fax 215-222-1101
**************************************
See what's free at http://www.aol.com.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.472 / Virus Database: 269.8.9/834 - Release Date: 6/5/2007 2:38
PM
