But by sponsoring the event, isn't the UCD providing some material
support? I figured their sponsorship meant they were paying for the
performance, or at least marketing it.

On 7/30/07, Ross Bender <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As crazy as Glenn may be, I think that one valid point he has been making
> (and making and making and making) is that Commercial entities ( like UCD
> try to claim true artistic content as their own, and market it to the masses
> for the sole purpose of making money (MAMMON). That's why I'm royally pissed
> to see the big banner in Clark Park advertising Shakespeare in the Park as
> another lame UCD product.
>
> Shakespeare in Clark Park was totally the brain flash of Marla Burkholder, a
> REAL actress, and friends. Marla will be playing Juliet.
>
> But UCD has to insert itself as the "sponsor". If Wendell Lewis gets up to
> make a speech on opening night about how "UCD brings you Shakespeare in
> Clark Park", I will be the first to hurl a tomato and holde up "FUCK UCD"
> signs.
>
> Lewis Wendell is a crass middleman, seeking to gain PROFIT for himself and
> his organization, by sponging off and parasiting the artistic talents of the
> Shakespearean artists who really bring you "Shakespeare in Clark Park". Fuck
> the Middleman, commercial geeks and profit seekers, and ALL HAIL to the
> ARTISTS of our HOOD, performing because they can't help themselves.
>
> --
> Ross Bender
> http://rossbender.org


-- 
Joshua Karstendick
----
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the
list named "UnivCity." To unsubscribe or for archive information, see
<http://www.purple.com/list.html>.

Reply via email to