AND publicly discrediting people on this list who disagree with the new listserv founders.
What's up with THAT? Is it civilized conversation (when attacks are made on the original UC Listserv), or a more politically expedient listserv for a developmental plan, where there might be some oppositional input? On 8/6/07 3:17 PM, "KAREN ALLEN" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > That may be true. You don't want contention on "your" list, while getting in > people's faces here. > > So if it's OK act like that here, then what's the problem??? Why a new > list??? It's OK to come onto MY list with garbage while simultaneously > claiming you hate garbage? You and Brian are saying you won't dirty up the > new list while throwing garbage here??? That's hypocrisy. > > Karen Allen > > > >> From: "Mike V." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> To: "'KAREN ALLEN'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,<UnivCity@list.purple.com> >> Subject: RE: [UC] Car jacking confirmation >> Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 14:58:43 -0400 >> >> Ah, I believe you are under a misapprehension, Karen. Kyle made up some >> rules for his mailing list, yes, but that rule certainly doesn't apply >> to this list, and despite what certain hatemongering gadflies may think, >> Kyle does not speak for everyone who happened to sign up for the mailing >> list that he founded. >> >> - Mike V. > > > ---- > You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the > list named "UnivCity." To unsubscribe or for archive information, see > <http://www.purple.com/list.html>. ---- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the list named "UnivCity." To unsubscribe or for archive information, see <http://www.purple.com/list.html>.
