--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Actually, while it may be that in court you don't > disclose your strategy, you do disclose your > evidence and issues before trial.? The evidence > comes out in discovery and the issues should be > framed in the pleadings. > > Paul
Paul, It seems that we may agree that this hotel project could be considered like an adversarial occurrence similar to court proceedings. Since Lussenhop has refused to disclose the massive evidence he must have assembled, do you think his petition should be summarily dismissed on the basis of contempt? Am I correct that in court the defendant (the community) must also be allowed to see evidence used against us before a decision is made? It seems that with this historical commission case the right to discovery is only for the benefit of the powerful side. Lussenhop/Campus Apts. seem to have everything in advance and the defendant gets to see nothing but the newspaper report, which exposed this assault. Is that UC Review report all Lussenhop has assembled to present today, I wonder? In community vs. Lussenhop, it would seem that only a kangaroo court would allow such a lopsided advantage just because he is a crony of Penn. These corporate clowns arent great friends of the funky neighborhood. We should never forget that they make it an adversarial relationship through secrecy and astroturfing and always always try to stack the deck then run out the clock! Thanks for the clarifying explanation about evidence in court. Your buddy, Glenn > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: univcity@list.purple.com > Sent: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 8:45 am > Subject: Re: [UC] 40th Street Hotel letter - an > interesting reply > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In a message dated 10/21/2007 11:49:42 P.M. Eastern > Daylight Time, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > > Hopefully without taking sides in this issue.....I'm > curious > about > your concern.? Why is it better to surprise the > developer with > your > concerns?? It seems to me that providing the > developer with time > to > consider your concerns allows him to more > thoughtfully take them > into > consideration. > > > > > > > > Oh, c'mon Stephen. It obviously biases the > proceedings at the Architectural > Committee meeting. Does one side of a court battle > tell the other its strategy? > > ? > > > If, in fact, someone working for the PHC leaked this > information to > Lussenhop, it's a breach of conduct and ethics that > could justifiably result in > immediate job termination. > > > ? > > > Always at > your service & ready for a dialog, > Al > Krigman > > > > > > > > See what's new at AOL.com and Make AOL Your > Homepage. > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________ > Email and AIM finally together. You've gotta check > out free AOL Mail! - http://mail.aol.com > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com ---- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the list named "UnivCity." To unsubscribe or for archive information, see <http://www.purple.com/list.html>.
