KAREN ALLEN wrote:
Tony, That is not public.


exactly. there have been no real efforts here to have a public community-wide meeting about this proposed hotel.

lussenhop's 'appearances' thus far (once at an 8 am first thursday meeting where melani said he didn't have much time, once at an 8 am meeting at the old folks room on market st. where there was confusion about the date, once at an shca election meeting where it wasn't announced to the members, wasn't on the agenda) -- each of tom's 3 presentations have been conducted 'under the radar', as though he's somehow embarrassed or bored or inconvenienced by his project, not at all like a developer who's enthusiastic or impassioned about informing as many neighbors as he can about his 11-story hotel at 40th and pine

yet lussenhop and his suits have told the architecture committee (oct 23) that they'd already had 2 open and public forums (as glenn and andy witnessed), and lussenhop & co. reiterated that claim at the philly historic commission hearing on nov 9. moreover, lussenhop's behind-the-scenes attempt to delist the property, his private invitations to selected individuals for cups of coffee, and his non-public participation on this list have been anything but open and public.

isn't it time we gave tom "your friendly neighborhood developer" the public stage he so obviously seeks and deserves? why doesn't tony west organize a public meeting? I'd help him publicize it. someone else could bring the mini-muffins. brian siano could videotape it.


- - - - -


anyway, for those still playing at home, here's the timeline so far (corrections welcome):


WED OCT 10 | UC REVIEW'S FIRST PUBLIC ARTICLE ABOUT HOTEL.
it's revealed that lussenhop has tried to get the mansion delisted earlier in the summer but was overruled by phc july 13. lussenhop says 'I wanted to get it de-listed to have greater choices, but once I realized the sentiment of the historical committee and neighborhood, I said 'fine, I'll work around it.' in that same article, barry grossbach says the shca zoning committee has met with lussenhop, but that no (public) zoning application has been made -- ie, no public discussion of zoning has taken place. additionally, there has been no mention of this hotel project in penn's dp, nor on ucd's website/publications, even though penn and ucd are (publicly) invested in developing 40th street.

WED OCT 23 | THE ARCHITECT COMMITTEE HEARING.
lussenhop's men testify that '2 open public forums' have taken place (glenn and andy witness this and report this onlist, and no one onlist who was also at that hearing denies it). the architect committee rules against the hotel proposal 4 to 2. that decision is to be forwarded to the philly historic commisssion's hearing, scheduled nov 9

FRI OCT 26 | THE OFFICIAL DATE SET BY PENN PRAXIS
for lussenhop to meet with friends of 40th street (8 am). inexplicably, lussenhop is a no-show and instead meets with friends on monday oct 29 (8 am?)

THUR NOV 1 | FIRST THURSDAY MEETING (8 am)
at walnut st library. melani reports on kyle's list that lussenhop didn't have much time to present, there were so many other things on the agenda ("It was a long First Thursday meeting, packed with agenda items, and Tom had only a few minutes to make his presentation.")

FRI NOV 9 | PHILLY HISTORIC COMMISSION HEARING
phc approves hotel proposal 'in concept'. lussenhop's hotel is now 11 stories tall, without approval by architect committee. again lussenhop's men testify that lussehop has met with 'the spruce hill community', and mysteriously,

TUE NOV 13 | SHCA'S ANNUAL ELECTION MEETING (7:30 pm)
at shca's annual election meeting for shca members, lussenhop presents proposal to about 45 people. shca members have not been informed that the hotel will be on the agenda, and in fact, it isn't. nor has the meeting been announced in the uc review in advance, the usual practice for community association meetings.


- - - - -




..................
UNIVERSITY*CITOYEN
[aka laserbeam®]
[aka ray]
SERIAL LIAR. CALL FOR RATES.
  "It is very clear on this listserve who
   these people are. Ray has admitted being
   connected to this forger."  -- Tony West
  "Ray's falsehoods are more sophisticated,
   more believable" -- Tony West












































































----
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the
list named "UnivCity." To unsubscribe or for archive information, see
<http://www.purple.com/list.html>.

Reply via email to