JackOfAll wrote: > Yes, it does happen, but another thing that is happening, is that by not > switching to new and improved code, the msperl upstream backport of dma > code, being a prime example..... Problems are now being reported that > would never have been reproducible if the new dma code was already in > mainstream use. > I have been using that code since January without a single issue, (ie. > for 6 months), and from a cyclic dma for I2S point of view, (which is > what you guys should be most bothered about with your audio distro), > I've already personally tested it on probably every DAC HAT/board your > users are actually using, and probably a few they are not, so hopefully > at the point that code is in use by pico, there wont be any bugs left to > find. Now that I should be getting paid for! Who should I send the bill > to? ;)
Thanks for the input, Right now, the kernel is 4.4.11 that is built, and we are starting to look at building. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ paul-'s Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=58858 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=105018 _______________________________________________ unix mailing list unix@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/unix
