I have a Sonnett ATA 100 (not the ATA 66) and I have a SIIG ATA 133. They are both good. The SIIG was a little cheaper but it is really an ACARD product rebranded.
I have these cards in a 7300 G3 375, Beige G3 266, 7600 G3 300, and a B&W 350. I have run OSX 10.1-10.1.5 on all of these and OSX 10.2.1 on the B&W. No problems. The SIIG in the B&W was the only way I could get ATA 133 drives to work if I used more that one drive. So the SIIG was better than the stock IDE when running OSX 10.2.1. I didn't try the Sonnett but I bet it would have worked also. Your milage may vary. Roger Larry Coltharp wrote: > If you had a choice between these two ATA controller cards, which one > would you use and why, please. > > Sonnet ATA/66 > SIIG ATA 100/133 Pro -- Unsupported OS X is sponsored by <http://lowendmac.com/> Support Low End Mac <http://lowendmac.com/lists/support.html> Unsupported OS X list info <http://lowendmac.com/lists/unsupported.html> --> AOL users, remove "mailto:"; Send list messages to: <mailto:UnsupportedOSX@;mail.maclaunch.com> To unsubscribe, email: <mailto:UnsupportedOSX-off@;mail.maclaunch.com> For digest mode, email: <mailto:UnsupportedOSX-digest@;mail.maclaunch.com> Subscription questions: <mailto:listmom@;lemlists.com> Archive <http://www.mail-archive.com/unsupportedosx%40mail.maclaunch.com/> Using a Mac? Free email & more at Applelinks! http://www.applelinks.com
