Personally I still think its a typo or laziness.
If they require FireWire then how is it that they don't require FW on old iMacs? So long as there are contradictions on the page I am going to assume that the general written requirements are what are accurate and that the inclusion of some specific models and not others in the lower section is ad-hoc.
There are several instances were Apple is grouping a couple series of Macs into one, its just the iMacs are the only one that seems to be causing a contradiction, I believe they simply did a bad job labeling supported systems, it seems by far the most likely.
David
On Apr 26, 2005, at 10:42 AM, Peter da Silva wrote:
http://www.apple.com/macosx/upgrade/requirements.html
Thanks, I got lost looking for that page again...
Still doesn't say "iMac G3 Slot Loading (DV or later)", it just says "iMac G3 Slot Loading". And I believe they know, I'm one of the no doubt many people who asked them why the Pismo wasn't there and I mentioned that the first gen slot loaders didn't do Firewire.
It's been that way a bit too long to be just a typo, I think.
-- Unsupported OS X is sponsored by <http://lowendmac.com/>
Support Low End Mac <http://lowendmac.com/lists/support.html>
Unsupported OS X list info <http://lowendmac.com/lists/unsupported.html> --> AOL users, remove "mailto:"; Send list messages to: <mailto:[email protected]> To unsubscribe, email: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For digest mode, email: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subscription questions: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Archive <http://www.mail-archive.com/unsupportedosx%40mail.maclaunch.com/>
iPod Accessories for Less at 1-800-iPOD.COM Fast Delivery, Low Price, Good Deal www.1800ipod.com
