I prefer video, but I feel demonstrations should have some production value other that just a screen share. Indicators, motion graphics, etc and not just a guy and his desktop. And EDITING!!! I'm a Final Cut Pro video guy these days and have ALL the groovy plugins so I'm not being fair I guess.
iMovie is far better these days that it used to be, but strangely very difficult to upgrade an iMovie package to Final Cut, once one is there. Roadblocks everywhere. Typical Apple %$#%#%#$%#$. sqb -- Stephen Barncard - Sebastopol Ca. USA - mixstream.org On Wed, Jul 8, 2020 at 10:36 AM Jim Lambert via use-livecode < use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote: > Hi André, > > I previously always favored printed books. > > But now I prefer digital materials that are a combination of text (with > copiable code!), interactive elements, and supplementary video. > As Richard pointed out LC itself provides "the many learning benefits of > direct engagement with interactive media.” > > IMO, Video is most appropriate when used to convey visual, spatial and > temporal examples. It’s can also provide a bit of a human touch to the > instruction, even though it’s utterly mechanical. > > So, yeah, I like a combo. > > Hope this helps! > > Jim Lambert > > > _______________________________________________ > use-livecode mailing list > use-livecode@lists.runrev.com > Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your > subscription preferences: > http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode > _______________________________________________ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode