No offense taken, François. As others have said, visual appeal was not my purpose. I maintain several apps that 'reach out' to a specific server from time to time and either initiate an action on the server or get info from it. In both cases, all the app wants is an API to the server-side stuff. So that's where my head is generally - I was pretending to be an application. So I produced a web page only an application could love! ;o)

Phil


J. Landman Gay wrote:
François Chaplais wrote:

I agree with Andre. To the average web user, what is displayed is pretty awful, and, even to a person with little rev experience such as me, the actual rev script is shorter and simpler to understand than to web output. This is not meant to be aggressive towards Phil, but I hope the engineers at the mothership will come up with some examples more convincing than that. Hey, 499 bucks is the price of a juicy Enterprise edition!
Really, there must be a way to make this good looking, no?

It isn't meant to be a web page, it's just a test page. When we used the old CGI method, there was an "echo.mt" script that just displayed all the server variables in the browser window. All web languages have a similar script.

Phil was showing how he converted the old CGI test script to the new method. The page information can be used for reference if the web developer needs to know the server configuration. It isn't meant to be used on a web site.

--
Phil Davis

PDS Labs
Professional Software Development
http://pdslabs.net

_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution

Reply via email to