No offense taken, François. As others have said, visual appeal was not
my purpose. I maintain several apps that 'reach out' to a specific
server from time to time and either initiate an action on the server or
get info from it. In both cases, all the app wants is an API to the
server-side stuff. So that's where my head is generally - I was
pretending to be an application. So I produced a web page only an
application could love! ;o)
Phil
J. Landman Gay wrote:
François Chaplais wrote:
I agree with Andre. To the average web user, what is displayed is
pretty awful, and, even to a person with little rev experience such
as me, the actual rev script is shorter and simpler to understand
than to web output. This is not meant to be aggressive towards Phil,
but I hope the engineers at the mothership will come up with some
examples more convincing than that. Hey, 499 bucks is the price of a
juicy Enterprise edition!
Really, there must be a way to make this good looking, no?
It isn't meant to be a web page, it's just a test page. When we used
the old CGI method, there was an "echo.mt" script that just displayed
all the server variables in the browser window. All web languages have
a similar script.
Phil was showing how he converted the old CGI test script to the new
method. The page information can be used for reference if the web
developer needs to know the server configuration. It isn't meant to be
used on a web site.
--
Phil Davis
PDS Labs
Professional Software Development
http://pdslabs.net
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution