Err, Ben, this is actually in place since forever... we can pass by references values with @....
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 5:51 AM, Ben Rubinstein <benr...@cogapp.com> wrote: > This is very bad news for my long-held campaign to introduce '@' as an > optional (but one day might be checked) prefix to a parameter, to indicate > in the calling line that this is passed by reference. > > ie > if functionWithSideEffects(tInput, @tOutput) then > ... > > should allow the reader to know immediately that 'functionWithSideEffects' > takes the second parameter by reference. > > On 05/09/2010 22:01, Mark Wieder wrote: >> >> Andre- >> >> Sunday, September 5, 2010, 11:37:46 AM, you wrote: >> >>> Folks, >> >>> Did you guys knew that "?" is a valid character for naming functions and >>> commands? I just created a function like that and it works >> >> ...it gets worse... see bz #8048 >> > > _______________________________________________ > use-revolution mailing list > use-revolution@lists.runrev.com > Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription > preferences: > http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution > -- http://www.andregarzia.com All We Do Is Code. _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
