Hi Alex,
Alex Tweedly wrote: > > Not quite. We specify pass-by-ref by using '@' in the handler > specification; you can't use it in the calling script as Ben did in his > example in the email. Ben wants to be able to use the '@' > (presumably as an option, with no actual effect) in the calling script, > to help remind him that the variable will/may be changed within the > handler. > -- Alex. > I have never used this method of "passing-by-reference" i any of my stack, so actually i dont know how useful it really is. Did you read this message of Wilhelm Sanke about image processing? http://lists.runrev.com/pipermail/use-revolution/2010-March/136246.html http://runtime-revolution.278305.n4.nabble.com/Language-comparisons-Lua-simpler-and-faster-than-RevTalk-td1586669.html http://www.mail-archive.com/use-revolution@lists.runrev.com/msg131812.html Could be possible to speed up Wilhelm's handlers that process binary image data using this method of "passing-by-reference"? Thanks in advance! Al -- View this message in context: http://runtime-revolution.278305.n4.nabble.com/feature-did-you-guys-knew-that-is-a-valid-character-for-function-command-name-tp2527567p2530061.html Sent from the Revolution - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution