Not quite. We specify pass-by-ref by using '@' in the handler
specification; you can't use it in the calling script as Ben did in his
example in the email. Ben wants to be able to use the '@' (presumably as
an option, with no actual effect) in the calling script, to help remind
him that the variable will/may be changed within the handler.
-- Alex.
On 07/09/2010 14:56, Andre Garzia wrote:
Err,
Ben, this is actually in place since forever... we can pass by
references values with @....
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 5:51 AM, Ben Rubinstein<benr...@cogapp.com> wrote:
This is very bad news for my long-held campaign to introduce '@' as an
optional (but one day might be checked) prefix to a parameter, to indicate
in the calling line that this is passed by reference.
ie
if functionWithSideEffects(tInput, @tOutput) then
...
should allow the reader to know immediately that 'functionWithSideEffects'
takes the second parameter by reference.
On 05/09/2010 22:01, Mark Wieder wrote:
Andre-
Sunday, September 5, 2010, 11:37:46 AM, you wrote:
Folks,
Did you guys knew that "?" is a valid character for naming functions and
commands? I just created a function like that and it works
...it gets worse... see bz #8048
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
