Ben- Tuesday, September 7, 2010, 1:51:35 AM, you wrote:
> This is very bad news for my long-held campaign to introduce '@' as an > optional (but one day might be checked) prefix to a parameter, to indicate in > the calling line that this is passed by reference. I went to go vote for this bug report/enhancement request, but I can't exactly find it. Are you referring to 741, 3753, 6820, or 6949? BZ#3753 seems the closest although 741 has more accumulated votes (8/1). And 6949 has 5 votes although it's somewhat a side effect of not having a generic ability to specify "@" in scripts. And 6820 has more votes than all the others combined, although it deals only with the special case of passing a reference to an array element. -- -Mark Wieder mwie...@ahsoftware.net _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
