Mmmm interesting issue. There is also a plan to use a vendored version of joda-time not sure on the progress on that one. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-5827
For Beam 3 that's the idea but so far there is not at ETA for Beam 3. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-5530 On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 4:15 PM rahul patwari <rahulpatwari8...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi David, > > The only incompatibility we have come across is this: > We have some timestamp format conversions in our project, where we are > converting from a timestamp format to another. > > With joda-time 2.4: > If we convert "2019-03-15 13:56:12" which is in "yyyy-MM-dd HH:mm:ss" format, > to "hh:mm:ss yy-MMM-dd z" format, the converted value is "01:56:12 19-Mar-15 > -07:00". > > Whereas with joda-time 2.9.3: > If we convert "2019-03-15 13:56:12" which is in "yyyy-MM-dd HH:mm:ss" format, > to "hh:mm:ss yy-MMM-dd z" format, the converted value is "01:56:12 19-Mar-15 > PDT". > > The javadoc for both the versions doesn't seem different though, for 'z' > DateTimeFormat. > > Even though the javadoc says - Zone names: Time zone names ('z') cannot be > parsed for both the versions, we are able to parse it in joda-time 2.9.3. > > Also, joda-time will be replaced with java time with Beam 3? > > Thanks, > Rahul > > On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 5:37 PM David Morávek <david.mora...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Hello Rahul, are there any incompatibilities you are running into with spark >> version? These versions should be backward compatible. >> >> For jodatime doc: >> The main public API will remain backwards compatible for both source and >> binary in the 2.x stream. >> >> This means you should be able to safely use Spark's version. >> >> D. >> >> On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 5:45 AM rahul patwari <rahulpatwari8...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >>> >>> Hi Ismael, >>> >>> We are using Beam with Spark Runner and Spark 2.4 has joda-time 2.9.3 as a >>> dependency. So, we have used joda-time 2.9.3 in our shaded artifact set. As >>> Beam has joda-time 2.4 as a dependency, I was wondering whether it would >>> break anything in Beam. >>> >>> Will joda-time be replaced with java time in Beam 3? What is the expected >>> release date of Beam 3? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Rahul >>> >>> On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 7:23 PM Ismaël Mejía <ieme...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hello, >>>> >>>> The long term goal would be to get rid of joda-time but that won't >>>> happen until Beam 3. >>>> Any 'particular' reason or motivation to push the upgrade? >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> Ismaël >>>> >>>> On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 11:53 AM rahul patwari >>>> <rahulpatwari8...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> > >>>> > Hi, >>>> > >>>> > Is there a plan to upgrade the dependency version of joda-time to 2.9.3 >>>> > or latest version? >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > Thanks, >>>> > Rahul
