Does anyone have any context on why we have such an old version of Joda time (2.4 released on 2014!) and if there is any possible issue upgrading it? If not maybe we can try to upgrade it..
On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 5:35 PM Ismaël Mejía <ieme...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Mmmm interesting issue. There is also a plan to use a vendored version > of joda-time not sure on the progress on that one. > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-5827 > > For Beam 3 that's the idea but so far there is not at ETA for Beam 3. > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-5530 > > On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 4:15 PM rahul patwari > <rahulpatwari8...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Hi David, > > > > The only incompatibility we have come across is this: > > We have some timestamp format conversions in our project, where we are > > converting from a timestamp format to another. > > > > With joda-time 2.4: > > If we convert "2019-03-15 13:56:12" which is in "yyyy-MM-dd HH:mm:ss" > > format, to "hh:mm:ss yy-MMM-dd z" format, the converted value is "01:56:12 > > 19-Mar-15 -07:00". > > > > Whereas with joda-time 2.9.3: > > If we convert "2019-03-15 13:56:12" which is in "yyyy-MM-dd HH:mm:ss" > > format, to "hh:mm:ss yy-MMM-dd z" format, the converted value is "01:56:12 > > 19-Mar-15 PDT". > > > > The javadoc for both the versions doesn't seem different though, for 'z' > > DateTimeFormat. > > > > Even though the javadoc says - Zone names: Time zone names ('z') cannot be > > parsed for both the versions, we are able to parse it in joda-time 2.9.3. > > > > Also, joda-time will be replaced with java time with Beam 3? > > > > Thanks, > > Rahul > > > > On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 5:37 PM David Morávek <david.mora...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > >> > >> Hello Rahul, are there any incompatibilities you are running into with > >> spark version? These versions should be backward compatible. > >> > >> For jodatime doc: > >> The main public API will remain backwards compatible for both source and > >> binary in the 2.x stream. > >> > >> This means you should be able to safely use Spark's version. > >> > >> D. > >> > >> On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 5:45 AM rahul patwari <rahulpatwari8...@gmail.com> > >> wrote: > >>> > >>> Hi Ismael, > >>> > >>> We are using Beam with Spark Runner and Spark 2.4 has joda-time 2.9.3 as > >>> a dependency. So, we have used joda-time 2.9.3 in our shaded artifact > >>> set. As Beam has joda-time 2.4 as a dependency, I was wondering whether > >>> it would break anything in Beam. > >>> > >>> Will joda-time be replaced with java time in Beam 3? What is the expected > >>> release date of Beam 3? > >>> > >>> Thanks, > >>> Rahul > >>> > >>> On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 7:23 PM Ismaël Mejía <ieme...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> Hello, > >>>> > >>>> The long term goal would be to get rid of joda-time but that won't > >>>> happen until Beam 3. > >>>> Any 'particular' reason or motivation to push the upgrade? > >>>> > >>>> Regards, > >>>> Ismaël > >>>> > >>>> On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 11:53 AM rahul patwari > >>>> <rahulpatwari8...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>> > > >>>> > Hi, > >>>> > > >>>> > Is there a plan to upgrade the dependency version of joda-time to > >>>> > 2.9.3 or latest version? > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > Thanks, > >>>> > Rahul
