I had a little, but nevertheless important problem using 2.0M3 instead of 1.1.1. When I tried to migrate to 2.0M3 I couldn't manage to deploy a database pool using the console. This was no problem in 1.1.1. Maybe this will be solved in the next milestone?
Regards Michael -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von Jacek Laskowski Gesendet: Donnerstag, 15. März 2007 11:30 An: user@geronimo.apache.org Betreff: Re: Is Version 1.1.1(Released September 18, 2006) the stable version for development? On 3/15/07, Joseph Kulandai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Is Version 1.1.1(Released September 18, 2006) the stable version for > development? > > I am planning to use Geronimo for development and I would like to know > which version is the latest stable version now? Please help me on this. I'm biased so take it with a grain of salt. I'd say go for Apache Geronimo v2 (http://geronimo.apache.org/2007/03/08/apache-geronimo-20-m3-released.html) that comes with the latest Java EE 5 bits. To me, 1.1.1 is as stable as 2.0M3 and don't be misled 1.1.1 is better (in terms of stability) than 2.0M3 only because of the release number. There's also the Geronimo Eclipse plugin to help you get started with Java EE 5 and Geronimo (http://geronimo.apache.org/development-tools.html). Download the unofficially official daily driver from. It's listed in the Daily Drivers of the Downloads section. It works with Eclipse IDE 3.3m5eh + WTP 2.0m5. When in doubt, ask your questions here. There's no better way to learn new stuff than asking about it in public ;-) Also, you may've noticed there's a shortage of 2.0 documentation so your questions and answers are likely to become part of it, too. Take a look at the website to find out more about Apache Geronimo and report any issues you run into on the user mailing list. Happy Java EE 5 coding with Apache Geronimo! Jacek -- Jacek Laskowski http://www.JacekLaskowski.pl
