A possible reason could be lots of DS services with greedy optional static dependencies started in different orders on the two OSs. If a service with such a reference is started first, it will get restarted every time a target service for the reference is started.
David Jencks Sent from my iPhone > On Nov 21, 2018, at 6:59 AM, Leschke, Scott <slesc...@medline.com> wrote: > > It still begs the question as to why you saw such a difference in times > between Windows and Mac. > > From: Oleg Cohen <oleg.co...@assurebridge.com> > Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2018 11:34 PM > To: user@karaf.apache.org > Subject: Re: Startup timing Windows vs. Mac > > Hi JB, > > Thank you for the clarification. I think the bundle load time on Windows was > affected by a large number of services in the component. I don’t know exactly > the reason, but how the OSGi container processes the bundle on startup was > much slower on Windows because I had a large number of services. I reworked > my architecture to reduce the number of service components and the startup > time went down quite a bit. > > Thank you, > Oleg > > > On Nov 20, 2018, at 11:55 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net> wrote: > > Hi Oleg, > > bundle:update is roughly equivalent to bundle:stop, bundle:uninstall, > bundle:install, bundle:start. It gets the "new" bundle version from the > bundle location (that you can see with bundle:list -l). > > Nothing suspicious in the bundle activator that could explain it takes > time to stop/start on windows ? > > Regards > JB > > On 21/11/2018 04:36, Oleg Cohen wrote: > > Hi JB, > > I don’t think the antivirus is an issue in my case. > > I did disable Windows Defender. My test case is with a single bundle > that is installed via this command: > > install reference:file://$eclipse_projects/sample.bundle.a > <file:///$eclipse_projects/sample.bundle.a> > > The location $eclipse_projects points to the local file system where > Eclipse projects for bundles reside. > > From Active state I run command *update sample.bundle.a* > > I see that the entire bundle start part of the update consists of two > parts. Right after the activation process starts I see a delay. No > logging occurs, even with the log level set to TRACE. Then log output > starts showing initialization of my bundle’s components/services. > > The latter part runs quick on both Windows and Mac and take about 1 sec. > However, the former part that is silent and takes about 5 sec on Mac and > 20 sec on Windows. So, 4 times slower on Windows. > > What happens with the bundle at the start? Are files copied? I do > suspect it has something to do with the file IO. > > Thank you, > Oleg > > > > On Nov 20, 2018, at 10:57 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net > <mailto:j...@nanthrax.net>> wrote: > > Yes, first, please try with the antivirus disabled. > > Regards > JB > > On 20/11/2018 16:26, Oleg Cohen wrote: > > Hi JB, > > Yes, it is Windows. It is exactly the same set of bundles and the > same Maven repository. Yes, there is Antivirus. I can try testing > with disabling it temporarily. > > How can I see what is being resolved/checked/updated/downloaded? I do > notice that Karaf has these long pauses. I am sure I can run pretty > much against the local repo. > > I would appreciate any pointers on how to speed up the startup! > > Best regards, > Oleg > > > On Nov 20, 2018, at 12:12 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net > <mailto:j...@nanthrax.net>> wrote: > > Hi Oleg, > > So Windows is longer than Mac (not surprising ;)). > > Did you check in term of bundles resolution ? Do the two systems use the > same Maven repository and network to resolve the artifacts. > > I already saw such issue due to the Windows antivirus: it verified any > artifacts downloaded by Karaf and it takes time. > > Do you have antivirus on the Windows system ? > > Regards > JB > > On 19/11/2018 21:12, Oleg Cohen wrote: > > Greetings, > > I have two systems: one Mac and one Windows. I have noticed that > exactly the same application with a number of bundles, both 3rd > party and my own, take significantly longer (1.5 vs 6 mins) on > Windows compared to Mac. Both systems are pretty powerful and have > similar resources. I was wondering if anybody has noticed the same. > What would be the best way to analyze the startup performance and > identify bottlenecks? > > Thank you, > Oleg > > > -- > Jean-Baptiste Onofré > jbono...@apache.org <mailto:jbono...@apache.org> > http://blog.nanthrax.net > Talend - http://www.talend.com > > > -- > Jean-Baptiste Onofré > jbono...@apache.org <mailto:jbono...@apache.org> > http://blog.nanthrax.net > Talend - http://www.talend.com > > > -- > Jean-Baptiste Onofré > jbono...@apache.org > http://blog.nanthrax.net > Talend - http://www.talend.com >
