On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 7:04 PM, Peter Hunsberger <peter.hunsber...@gmail.com > wrote:
> One question, and I bet I won't be the only one asking it... > > If SQL is the target to mimic, why not "WHERE" instead of "PATTERN" ? > PATTERN is a new construct, not replacing WHERE. WHERE is still in there<https://github.com/neo4j/community/blob/pql/pql/src/test/scala/org/neo4j/pql/PqlParserTest.scala#L124> . > Otherwise, wouldn't xQuery be perhaps an even more logical target? Heathen! Seriously - it's mostly centered around XPath expressions, which are great for tree structures, but maybe not what we need for our complex patterns. I can't really see what's left of XQuery if you remove the XPath parts. Do you have any concrete ideas I could ponder over? Thanks a lot for your feedback - it makes our lives much easier when people are vocal about their opinions! Andrés _______________________________________________ Neo4j mailing list User@lists.neo4j.org https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
