Mahout 0.9 and 0.10.0 are using Lucene 4.6.1. There's been a change in the
TokenStream workflow in Lucene post-Lucene 4.5.

What exactly are u trying to do and where is it u r stuck now? It would
help if u posted a code snippet or something.

On Sat, May 9, 2015 at 10:51 AM, Lewis John Mcgibbney <
lewis.mcgibb...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Suneel,
> Yes this is true. It was dropped exactly due to the Lucene upgrade.
> I'm still working on understanding what to use as the underlying Analyzer
> interface from Lucene also dropped the Definition of reusableTokenStream
> method call!
> Is there any other advice to hand with what to suggest is suitable for
> making the upgrade.
> The project I am working on is using Hadoop 1.2.X and will not be upgrading
> for a while. mahout 0.9 would work perfectly well with this distro however
> upgrade is slightly so fusing right now based on the API being broken as
> oppose to deprecated.
> Thanks again for any help.
> Lewis
>
> On Saturday, May 9, 2015, Suneel Marthi <smar...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Not sure how this was used in 0.7 (its > 3 yrs legacy). But I am guessing
> > this would have been required for Lucene 3x back then and must have been
> > dropped for the Lucene 4x upgrade for 0.8 (circa late 2012).
> >
> > On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 8:03 PM, Lewis John Mcgibbney <
> > lewis.mcgibb...@gmail.com <javascript:;>> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Folks,
> > > I'm making an upgrade from Mahout 0.7 --> 0.9.
> > > I am experiencing the same problem as experienced in the following post
> > > [0].
> > > Can someone please suggest what I should replace DefaultAnalyzer with?
> I
> > am
> > > aware that it was removed from the Mahout API in 0.8?
> > > In the meantime I am going to tst an implementation of Lucene's base
> > > implementation for the Lucene version matching Mahout 0.9.
> > > Thanks in advance to anyone who has the context here.
> > > Best
> > > Lewis
> > >
> > > [0] http://www.mail-archive.com/user%40mahout.apache.org/msg14344.html
> > >
> > > --
> > > *Lewis*
> > >
> >
>
>
> --
> *Lewis*
>

Reply via email to