On Oct 23, 2007, at 1:24 AM, Carl Johansson wrote:


I have tried naked 4.0 and it works well for me. However it would be great to have partymgr and securityext for logins. Am I wrong about this? If not, is
anyone else interested in this aswell?

Could you be more specific about what you have in mind? The UserLogin entity is in the framework and should work fine without the party and securityext components.

If you want the partymgr you're opening a whole can of worms, as there is a lot in it and it isn't designed to be used independent of the other applications components. It can certainly be isolated, but I'd be very surprised if it was worth the effort.

-David


David E Jones wrote:


Just delete the entire applications folder (and you can delete the
specialpurpose folder as well).

I haven't tested this in a while, but it should still work without
problems unless a new framework -> applications dependency has
slipped in (which is a big NO NO!).

-David

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Reply via email to