It depends. If you use 4.0 and just remove applications and special purpose and edit them out in the component load you should be just fine. Perhaps you using the trunk, then I wouldn't know.
Mathius Allo wrote: > > Ok. I see. I haven't tried this as I read previous posts that there will > be dependency issues if trying to slim down OFBiz. I'll try it out. > > > Thanks. > Mathius > > Carl Johansson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi Hathius! > > I did not keep any of the applications so there was really no dependency > issue. I just removed the application folder and adjusted the component > load. Or did I get you wrong now? > > > Mathius Allo wrote: >> >> Hi Carl, >> >> Did you document on the steps to avoid the dependency issues? >> >> Thanks, >> Mathius >> >> Carl Johansson wrote: >> Yes of course. I was under the impression - as you probably noticed - >> that >> the UserLogin entity was in the Party application. Basically what I am >> wondering then is if I can use the framework alone to manage permissions >> and >> logins in a secure way. The way you always do in the other apps. >> >> >> David E Jones wrote: >>> >>> >>> On Oct 23, 2007, at 1:24 AM, Carl Johansson wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> I have tried naked 4.0 and it works well for me. However it would >>>> be great to >>>> have partymgr and securityext for logins. Am I wrong about this? If >>>> not, is >>>> anyone else interested in this aswell? >>> >>> Could you be more specific about what you have in mind? The UserLogin >>> entity is in the framework and should work fine without the party and >>> securityext components. >>> >>> If you want the partymgr you're opening a whole can of worms, as >>> there is a lot in it and it isn't designed to be used independent of >>> the other applications components. It can certainly be isolated, but >>> I'd be very surprised if it was worth the effort. >>> >>> -David >>> >>> >>>> David E Jones wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Just delete the entire applications folder (and you can delete the >>>>> specialpurpose folder as well). >>>>> >>>>> I haven't tested this in a while, but it should still work without >>>>> problems unless a new framework -> applications dependency has >>>>> slipped in (which is a big NO NO!). >>>>> >>>>> -David >>>>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://www.nabble.com/how-to-disable-an-application-from-ofbiz-webtools-tf4672472.html#a13359349 >> Sent from the OFBiz - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> >> >> >> __________________________________________________ >> Do You Yahoo!? >> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around >> http://mail.yahoo.com >> > > -- > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/how-to-disable-an-application-from-ofbiz-webtools-tf4672472.html#a13359897 > Sent from the OFBiz - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > http://mail.yahoo.com > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/how-to-disable-an-application-from-ofbiz-webtools-tf4672472.html#a13364620 Sent from the OFBiz - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
