Matheus, Yes, you are able to use WebTools running only the components in the framework folder. One easy way to solve the issue of the UiLabel dependency from securityext is to simply move the SecurityextUiLabels.properties (right filename is it?) into framework/security. I think that since the framework uses these labels they should be in the framework folder so this problem won't come up again.
Matheus Eduardo Machado Moreira-3 wrote: > > I'm running into the same problem here (framework not able to find > SecurityextUiLabels), so I cannot log in into Webtools application. I'd > like > to use Webtools to manage my entities while I develop my application. I > didn't delete the applications and specialpurpose folders yet but I > changed > the build and component-load files to avoid building and loading these > undesired applications. > > Am I able to use Web Tools application loading only the framework > components? If not, what is the minimum set of applications necessary to > do > it? > > Atenciosamente, > > Matheus Eduardo Machado Moreira > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > "Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent." > Salvor Hardin (The Foundation, Isaac Asimov) > > 2007/10/28, Carl Johansson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> >> >> David, >> >> I have been using 4.0 now using only the framework. Everything worked >> fine >> until I switched db. Moving from the derby caused problems. Trying to >> login >> you get "SecuirtyextUiLabels not found for locale" since >> LoginServices.java >> uses those resources. I suppose this has to do with new database not >> having >> any userlogins (since they're not imported when they're in securityext) >> and >> then trying to get the ui labels but does not find them. Is it supposed >> to >> be this way? >> >> >> David E Jones wrote: >> > >> > >> > On Oct 23, 2007, at 1:24 AM, Carl Johansson wrote: >> > >> >> >> >> I have tried naked 4.0 and it works well for me. However it would >> >> be great to >> >> have partymgr and securityext for logins. Am I wrong about this? If >> >> not, is >> >> anyone else interested in this aswell? >> > >> > Could you be more specific about what you have in mind? The UserLogin >> > entity is in the framework and should work fine without the party and >> > securityext components. >> > >> > If you want the partymgr you're opening a whole can of worms, as >> > there is a lot in it and it isn't designed to be used independent of >> > the other applications components. It can certainly be isolated, but >> > I'd be very surprised if it was worth the effort. >> > >> > -David >> > >> > >> >> David E Jones wrote: >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> Just delete the entire applications folder (and you can delete the >> >>> specialpurpose folder as well). >> >>> >> >>> I haven't tested this in a while, but it should still work without >> >>> problems unless a new framework -> applications dependency has >> >>> slipped in (which is a big NO NO!). >> >>> >> >>> -David >> >>> >> > >> > >> > >> >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://www.nabble.com/how-to-disable-an-application-from-ofbiz-webtools-tf4672472.html#a13451525 >> Sent from the OFBiz - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> >> > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/how-to-disable-an-application-from-ofbiz-webtools-tf4672472.html#a13503697 Sent from the OFBiz - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
